Eric Schmidt, Web 2.0 vs. Web 3.0
May.01, 2010 in
Home Video Marketing
(via koreacrunch.com Eric said about Web 2.0 and future web based on Ajax applications for Web 3.0 from
25 Comments on “Eric Schmidt, Web 2.0 vs. Web 3.0”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
May 1st, 2010 at 3:03 am
I’m waiting for Web 5. 9. .
May 1st, 2010 at 3:25 am
*insert tongue here for web 6. 0 experience*
Who knows
May 1st, 2010 at 3:33 am
I wonder if people will ever use this term
May 1st, 2010 at 4:09 am
we’ll have beta as well soon.
I look at it that we are transitioning from first gen to second gen, second gen being common formats and ‘semantic’ content, and the different presentation of websites, much more multi-media rather than just text etc. But even then I don’t think its possible to classify the web, ridiculous notion really, its got too many disparate aspects.
May 1st, 2010 at 4:31 am
Ok, so what is Web 4. 0 and 5. 0? Do you plan any service packs or interim releases for this? Come on. . . Stop the marketing. Web is web. It’s evolving all the time, as the we are exploring new possibilities and inventing new technologies. That’s all. There are no web 2. 0 or 3. 0. There is only THE INTERNET! Nothing more than world-wide computer network. Greetz.
May 1st, 2010 at 5:02 am
@krazythug971 well that’s my opinion . . thnx anyway
May 1st, 2010 at 5:45 am
@Ezzooooo what do you know bout brain?
it’s easy to think like dat mann. . .
just cuz 99% of poeple are dumb they think when they find one from the 1% he is the best lmaaaaooo
stop plizzzz and run yoself
May 1st, 2010 at 6:08 am
sooner or later the internet is going to be like online gaming communities. You build your character and you travel through the internet going to different stores and sites in a 3D world. Its going to be just like the futurama episode where they put on virtual reality suits and go to the internet. So instead of physically going to a store, you log into your “internet” character and visit best buy in a 3D virtual world (the Virtual internet’s graphics will one day be as good as the avatar movie)
May 1st, 2010 at 7:06 am
jQuery is not an alternative for ajax (asynchronous JavaScript and XML) but JavaScript library
May 1st, 2010 at 7:17 am
what’s so hard about it?
web 1. 0: the network that connects people with static content provided by the siteowner
web 2. 0: user provided content
web 3. 0: semantically interconnected data provided by everyone from everywhere.
not so hard to understand. . just the basic concepts of how we use the internet.
May 1st, 2010 at 7:35 am
hahaha if his idea of web 3. 0 comes true then you can expect a new era of Viruses. And you can also expect me to write some because I am going to make BANK with such an open platform!
May 1st, 2010 at 8:16 am
web 3. 0 is a marketing trick invented by non-programmers. xD
May 1st, 2010 at 8:48 am
Never going to happen. Schools and businesses will see this as some kind of game, and the web will no longer be a quick place to go to get quick information. You’ll be wandering aimlessly with your avatar til you find what you need,.
May 1st, 2010 at 9:44 am
If there’s Gonna Be a web 3. 0 then these browsers should be in 3D environment and when browsing for informations, your own IP address will be a 3D character wandering around the cloud then can look for the nearest 3D Character(IP ADDRESS). Well that’s just an option though “wandering online”. . . you can type the “(DOMAIN name/IP Address/3D Character)” where your 3d char. will be in fly position(as in fly while website is loading),,,
But that’s just 1 of my Dream thou but it’s FEASIBLE. . .
May 1st, 2010 at 10:36 am
I’m a new web design/developer freelancer
here’s what I know about
WEB 2. 0:
COOL WEB DESIGNS
100% CSS (TABLELESS) STRUCTURE DESIGN
AJAX POWERED(or u can go for jquery and other alternatives)
PHP/ASP with DAtabase
fast interactive loading of data send/recieve(not flash interactivity)
so what is Web 3. 0?
May 1st, 2010 at 11:01 am
i consider Eric Schmidt is one of the best brains on earth now . . i like the way he think
May 1st, 2010 at 11:32 am
Joswskey, that’s some bull the iPhone has alot of limitations, and to let you know the iPhone accesses certain webpages that aren’t social networking, news, or viral video sites that uses flash except Hulu. Have you tried to access any message boards on that shit? Any IRC chatrooms? No
No. It’s too much memory and also Twitter can’t be accessed on no phone via standard.
May 1st, 2010 at 11:43 am
Finally on YouTube who has knowledge!
May 1st, 2010 at 12:41 pm
Second point: An application is a tool that runs on a computer. That you think an executable on your PC has to exist, is because you don’t really understand the stuff you are talking about.
May 1st, 2010 at 1:16 pm
The internet is not the web. E-mail runs on the internet, but doesn’t run on the web.
The web is the links between individual documents and programs running on servers. The internet is the structure that makes this possible.
May 1st, 2010 at 2:05 pm
Cloud computing pretty much sucks except for certain specialized applications, like YT perhaps. but it’s not useful for the average ecommerce site.
May 1st, 2010 at 2:16 pm
Web 2. 0 makes sense. Web 3. 0 doesn’t.
May 1st, 2010 at 2:35 pm
lol dont think the CEO of google would agree with that hah
May 1st, 2010 at 3:09 pm
Web 3. 0 FAIL (but Eric discretely makes him less fail)
May 1st, 2010 at 3:17 pm
He must be talking about Web Hooks and/or FireFox’s Ubiquity